I’ve toyed with the idea of getting rid of my Start Menu for a while – it seems to take forever to find programs when I need them and to be honest – it doesn’t seem like the best way of doing things.
I’ve seen a few websites talking about the virtues of search-based program launchers – where you type part of the program name and the launcher tries to find it and launch it for you so I thought I’d install a few and see what I thought. I installed Launchy, Enso Launcher, Colibri and Find and Run Robot and spent a day or so trying to use each one.
How they work
Most (if not all) of the keyboard-based program launchers scan the Start Menu for shortcuts that are then added to an internal database. The launcher then uses that internal database to try to match the program names as you type the name. Some launchers also scan the Quicklaunch folder or other locations.
Launchy
I nearly stuck with Launchy. I really liked it. It’s open-source and it doesn’t pretend to be anything other than what it is – a more efficient program launcher. It looks the part too. If I’m going to use something to replace my Start Menu it needs to look pretty.
The only reason I didn’t keep using Launchy is the list of options that appears below the text-box. The options are displayed as a cramped scrolling box using teeny-tiny text and teeny-tiny icons. I want something that I can just glance at. Compare the image to the right with the list that Colibri offers. The icons are much bigger, making it much easier to make a choice from the alternatives (should you need to).
Some people might like the Google integration, weather and other extras that the plug-in architecture offers Launchy users but for me those extras didn’t overcome the lack of visual appeal.
Enso Launcher
Enso used to be a commercial program launcher that cost $19.99. It’s now free to download and use. I know I’d have been annoyed if I’d have paid for it.
I didn’t like the way this one installed itself as a local server on port 7070. When the program started my firewall was throwing up all sorts of objections – something else I found to be a serious annoyance. I only needed a program launcher and that seemed a bit too invasive to me.
I liked the transparent overlays and the use of my Caps Lock key (I hate the Caps key – I’m always accidentally turning CAPS on) but to open a program I had to type the word, “open” before each application name. It didn’t feel anywhere near as intuitive as the developers claimed and they seemed to take themselves far too seriously. I thought their website and documentation read like some kind of new-age religion pamphlet.
Humanized love the look of their software (or perhaps themselves) so much that they don’t give you any way of tailoring it to your own tastes. No skins. No themes. It’s their way or nothing.
Enso Launcher didn’t even stay on my computer for a day. It felt so incredibly awkward to use. Enso Launcher used about 30Mb on my system.
Colibri – Type Ahead
I almost didn’t bother with Colibri because I hated the name until I discovered it’s the genus of the Hummingbird. Anyway, I got over the name and I’m glad I installed it because Colibri is the launcher I’m still using. It’s fast, it works the way I envisaged a launcher needed to work for me and it just feels… ‘right’.
Colibri allows you to select different themes to make it look as you wish – I’m not sure how much flexibility there is in the theme design but I’ve already found a theme that works for me (shown in the conclusion). It’s just lucky for me that I like the theme because I’ve only found one other one on DeviantArt but that was pink.
In all honesty I don’t think it really does anything that Launchy doesn’t do and I recommend you try them both to see which one you like best. Colibri’s two big failings are its very poor user documentation and the fact that a new version hasn’t been released in quite some time.
Colibri uses about 20Mb on my system.
Find and Run Robot (FARR)
FARR works as you’d expect but it was too ugly for me to keep using. There was something about it that I just didn’t like and I stopped using it half-way through the day and returned to launching things from the desktop or Start menu. I came across some reports on the Internet of FARR popping up nag-screens about donating to the developer but I never experienced any (perhaps because I only used it for half a day).
FARR does allow you to choose a skin for the pop-up window but it still looks like a normal window that’s been skinned (i.e. titlebar, scroll-bar etc are all there looking like every other application).
One of my biggest complaints about FARR (beyond cosmetic issues) is that it lists the shortcuts for an application, the application executable, the applications folder (as I’ve shown in this screenshot). I just want my launcher to show the application.
FARR could be useful to people that wanted to find files and folders on their system as well as applications.
FARR used about 12Mb on my system.
Conclusion
In the end I’m still using Colibri (using the Tordo theme by Anhdres shown in the screenshot to the right). Most of the launchers did pretty much the same thing but I just seemed to click with the way Colibri works.
The two biggest draw-backs about Colibri are the lack of documentation and the serious shortage of theme choices. To be honest, I didn’t find it that hard to figure out how to use it but that lack of themes may frustrate fans of desktop eye-candy.
I’m sure there are users of each launcher that will say their preferred launcher is better but my choice isn’t based upon what other people think; it’s based upon which of the launchers feels right for me and that was Colibri. ;-)




I recommend SuperLauncher. I have tested most Windows launchers and I even like some but the problem with all launchers is that either they make it difficult to input new shortcuts or they go ahead and index my entire PC. The indexers do not support hotkeys, and the ones that do support hotkeys make me type in URLS, or browse my PC in order to add new shortcuts.
With SuperLauncher I drag and drop what I realize is becoming repetitive. I simply drag, drop, and either assign a hotkey or list it on the one-click popup menu. Plus I can group shortcuts which means I can open two folders for backup reasons, or I can open all the files that I need to complete a step-by-step procedure, all with one keystroke.
I guess I really love it because of the drag & drop. It is just simple like software should be. Overall it allows me to work fast, and I mean really fast.
I totally recommend it. You can find SuperLauncher at:
http://www.pcwinsoft.com/superlauncher/
Regards,
Alex Ferri
Thanks for your comment Alex.
You might have noticed that I only evaluated products that are available for free (being the complete cheap-skate that I am). I suppose $19.99 isn’t that much to pay for a piece of software but as a college tutor I don’t have that much money to play with. :)
Hi Phil,
I found your write up useful and wanted to thank you for taking the time to write it. I’m the author of Find and Run Robot — it’s very useful to hear why people do or do not like it. Sometimes things are easy to fix, sometimes not. With all the options you could probably tweak FARR to show you only what you want, but it’s useful to hear how it didn’t really behave the way you wanted it to out of the box — something for me to consider — maybe some kind of inital setup wizard which helped users initially configure FARR to act like they expect.. not a bad idea.
if you ever do decide to try it again or have any more suggestions i’m all ears; ps on our forum there are people who like all sorts of different launchers and if you feel like it, do drop by, or check the bottom of the farr help file for a list of tons more launchers from different companies, you might still find a new one that captures your heart.
-mouser
Hi Mouser – nice to hear from you.
To be honest I’m surprised that so many people are finding my mini-review so soon after I posted it.
To be fair, I didn’t delve into all the settings and options of any of the applications. The purpose of my evaluation was partly to see which launcher felt intuitive enough to not require in-depth configuration or exploration of user documentation. As you suggest, some kind of set-up wizard that allowed first-time users to select pre-defined setting templates would be a great idea.
For my purposes, I just wanted to see the applications that I have installed with the possibility of defining my own custom short-cuts (e.g. for URLS or applications that aren’t installed to the Start Menu tree). As a college lecturer I have many files and folders on my drives containing handouts, partly developed tutorial materials and so on – and I don’t want to see them unless I’m actually working. ;)
I perhaps unfairly (or inaccurately) referred to FARR as ‘ugly’. What I didn’t really explain was that I wanted a launcher to feel like a seamless part of my operating system and the standard windows furniture kind of spoiled that effect. If there is an option to remove the standard control icons and title bar then I’d be much happier. :)
Phil
no worries about calling it ugly.. you’re not the first one :)
there are actually a ton of skins for farr, but it still has a rather “plain” look.
farr does let you set up custom aliases to list whatever you want, and customize what directories are searched by default, and add special modifiers if you only want to search certain directories when you specify certain keywords, but like i said i know how some things just work the way you expect them and if they require too much configuration to match your style of working, then it’s understandable that you wouldn’t want to mess with it further.